MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1725644710 · doi:10.1139/v11-114

Studies on tautomerism in the triazoline dione

2011· article· en· W1725644710 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alireza Salimi Beni, Zeinab Dalirnasab, Abbas Teimouri, Alireza Najafi Chermahini

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYasouj University
KeywordsTautomerChemistryIntramolecular forceMoleculeProtonSolventDipoleComputational chemistrySolvent effectsTransition statePhysical chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemical properties of the triazoline dione have been extensively studied. The relative stability of three tautomers in the gas phase and solution (using PCM model) are evaluated using HF and DFT methods and compared with MP2 level using different basis sets. The results of the calculations indicate that 4H-1,2,4-triazole-3,5-dione (K form) is more stable in the gas phase than in solution. In addition, the transition states of proton transfer reaction is calculated. The vibrational frequencies and corresponding normal mode assignments of 4H-1,2,4-triazole-3,5-dione and 5-hydroxy-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one (E1 form) are also theoretically examined. In addition, the variation of dipole moments and charges on atoms with change of solvent is studied. Specific solvent effects with addition of one molecule of water near the electrophilic centers of three tautomers and the transition state of proton transfer assisted by a water molecule was investigated. Aggregation with water molecules does not change the order of stability of isomers, but proton transfer reaction assisted by a water molecule needs less energy than the intramolecular process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207