MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Контроль за предоставлением платных медицинских услуг населению в Республике Татарстан

2009· article· ru· W17261295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
В. И. Завалёв

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Росздравнадзора · 2009
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyclinicQuarter (Canadian coin)Medical careBusinessMedical emergencyGeographyMedicineFamily medicineArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

85 (53,1%) out of 160 municipal and district inpatient care establishments and 303 (53,40%) out of 568 outpatient and polyclinic institutions in Moscow provide services on a feepaying basis. Inspection procedures carried out by Roszdravnadzor in the city of Moscow and Moscow Oblast revealed a set of violations in offering medical services to the public on the commercial basis. In 2008 and in the first quarter of 2009 Roszdravnadzor accounted for 78 surveillance procedures of similar kind. The article describes the main disadvantages revealed during the inspections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник РосздравнадзораSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207