Network tomography by Non Negative Matrix Factorization (NNMF)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the application of a matrix based technique to eliminate the assumption of a known routing matrix in network tomography. Network tomography is an effective means of determining network performance parameters such as delay and packet loss rate (PLR). It gives indirect inference of network characteristics using active probes or passive monitoring of packets. Most of the network tomography research unrealistically assumes that the routing matrix is known and models network tomography as an inverse problem. This motivates us to look for more appropriate methods for the inverse problem solution where the routing matrix is accommodated by the statistical ability of such methods as Non Negative Matrix Factorization (NNMF). NNMF is used to factorize a matrix into two factors (matrices). The whole process involves matrices and optimizing the residue (difference between the initial value and the current value of a cost function) to obtain the best result. We have applied NNMF to the data obtained from a laboratory test bed to perform delay tomography under various traffic conditions. The simulation results verify that NNMF performs network tomography accurately without a priori knowledge of the routing matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it