MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W172706334

Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Emerging Applications of M&S in Industry and Academia Symposium

2012· article· en· W172706334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpring Simulation Multiconference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Engineering ethicsGovernment (linguistics)Panel discussionEngineeringEngineering managementComputer sciencePolitical scienceLibrary scienceBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SpringSim'12, sponsored by the Society for Modeling and Simulation (SCS) and in collaboration with the ACM SIGSIM, brings together scientists and scholars from a variety of disciplines to collaborate and exchange ideas. Featuring members of industry, academia, military, and government from all over the world, SpringSim continues its mission to offer a unique setting for the discussion and advancement of all aspects of modeling and simulation. SpringSim'12 features an exciting group of world-renowned experts giving presentations concerning a variety of topics. Many of the SpringSim symposiums will offer tutorials and panel discussions covering topics specific to those fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it