MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1727611463 · doi:10.4000/formationemploi.1606

Vers des politiques d’éducation « capacitantes » ?

2007· article· fr· W1727611463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFormation emploi · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceRedistribution (election)SociologyPhilosophyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte traite des limites des politiques éducatives en Communauté française de Belgique, interrogées à l’aune de la théorie des capacités d’Amartya Sen. Les auteurs soutiennent l’hypothèse selon laquelle l’action publique récente en matière d’éducation témoigne d’un double déplacement des politiques d’égalité des chances, traditionnellement axées sur la redistribution de ressources éducatives : par l’intérêt pour l’égalisation des résultats, d’une part, et par une préoccupation pour les facteurs individuels, collectifs et institutionnels facilitant ou non l’usage des ressources éducatives par tous les élèves, d’autre part. Ils montrent cependant à quel point ces politiques restent trop sommaires et ambiguës pour que l’on puisse réellement parler de politiques d’éducation capacitantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it