The Contribution of French Musicians to the Genesis of the Italian Madrigal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment se fait-il qu’un Français soit considéré comme le fondateur du madrigal, un des artefacts caractéristiques de la culture italienne de la Renaissance? Pour répondre à cette question, il faut commencer par un bref survol des commentaires et des documents d’archives de la Renaissance qui insistent sur le fait que les musiciens français et franco-flamands prédominaient dans les chapelles italiennes des XVe et XVIe siècles, en raison de politiques culturelles délibérées.Dans une réflexion plus précise sur la genèse dumadrigal à Florence, cet article examine le fonctionnement interne des chapelles florentines au début du XVIe siècle et, plus particulièrement, le rôle du Français Philippe Verdelot, le maître de chapelle de la Cathédrale et du Baptistère dans les années 1520. Celui-ci fut impliqué de près dans le développement du madrigal à ses tout débuts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".