MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W172883995

Ecclesiastical authority and religious autonomy: canon 679 under glass

2004· article· en· W172883995 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rose McDermott

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia canonica · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanonHumanitiesEthnologyPhilosophyArtSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le canon 679 intimide souvent les professeurs et les etudiants, et n'est pas tres bien accueilli par le canoniste plus modere. Le canon reflete le pouvoir disciplinaire de l'eveque diocesain dans une criseurgente concernant un religieux, la negligence d'un superieur majeur et l'envoi subsequent au Saint-Siege. Dans l'article, l'A. scrute le canon 679, principalement a la lumiere du canon 17 pour bien comprendre cette loi ecclesiastique. Les conditions specifiques pour l'application du canon 679 et leur interpretation juste demandent une action dont la responsabilite revient a l'eveque et demontrent aussi le role important du superieur majeur. Bien que le canon 679 n'est applique que rarement, il demontre l'importance de la cooperation et la collaboration entre l'eveque diocesain et le superieur majeur lorsqu'il y a une urgente gravissima causa, specialement lorsque le bien-etre des fideles chretiens est menace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia canonicaSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207