Ecclesiastical authority and religious autonomy: canon 679 under glass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le canon 679 intimide souvent les professeurs et les etudiants, et n'est pas tres bien accueilli par le canoniste plus modere. Le canon reflete le pouvoir disciplinaire de l'eveque diocesain dans une criseurgente concernant un religieux, la negligence d'un superieur majeur et l'envoi subsequent au Saint-Siege. Dans l'article, l'A. scrute le canon 679, principalement a la lumiere du canon 17 pour bien comprendre cette loi ecclesiastique. Les conditions specifiques pour l'application du canon 679 et leur interpretation juste demandent une action dont la responsabilite revient a l'eveque et demontrent aussi le role important du superieur majeur. Bien que le canon 679 n'est applique que rarement, il demontre l'importance de la cooperation et la collaboration entre l'eveque diocesain et le superieur majeur lorsqu'il y a une urgente gravissima causa, specialement lorsque le bien-etre des fideles chretiens est menace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".