The Blackwell guide to the modern philosophers: from Descartes to Nietzsche
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
List of Contributors. Preface. 1. RenU Descartes (1596--1650): Gary Hatfield (University of Pennsylvania). 2. Thomas Hobbes (1588--1679): A. P. Martinich (University of Texas at Austin). 3. Benedict de Spinoza (1632--1677): Don Garrett (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 4. Nicolas Malebranche (1638--1715): Steven Nadler (University of Wisconsin, Madison). 5. G. W. Leibniz (1646--1716): Donald Rutherford (The University of California, San Diego). 6. John Locke (1632--1704): Martha Brandt Bolton (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey). 7. George Berkeley (1685--1753): George Pappas (Ohio State University). 8. David Hume (1711--1776): David Fate Norton (McGill University). 9. Thomas Reid (1710--1796): Ernest Sosa (Brown University) James Van Cleve (Brown University). 10. Jean--Jacques Rousseau (1712--1788): N. J. H. Dent (University of Birmingham, England). 11. Immanuel Kant (1724--1804): Patricia Kitcher (Columbia University). 12. Jeremy Bentham (1748--1832): Ross Harrison (Kinga s College, Cambridge University). 13. G. W. F. Hegel (1770--1831): Stephen Houlgate (University of Warwick). 14. S?ren Kierkegaard (1813--1855):C. Stephen Evans (Calvin College). 15. Arthur Schopenhauer (1788--1860): Christopher Janaway (Birkbeck College, The University of London). 16. John Stuart Mill (1806--1873): Wendy Donner (Carleton University) Richard Fumerton (University of Iowa). 17. Karl Marx (1818--1883): Terrell Carver (University of Bristol, England). 18. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844--1900): Richard Schacht (University of Illinois, Urbana--Champaign). Select Bibliography. Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it