MULTISPIN MEMBRANE SOLUTIONS IN <font>AdS</font><sub>4</sub> ×Q<sup>1, 1, 1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study several types of classical rotating membrane solutions in AdS 4 ×Q1, 1, 1 and discuss their field theory duals. Q1, 1, 1 is a seven-dimensional Sasaki–Einstein manifold given as a nontrivial U(1) fibration over S2×S2×S2, equipped with SU(2)3 ×U(1) isometry. It is recently suggested that there exist quiver Chern–Simons theories which are dual to M-theory in certain orbifolds of Q1, 1, 1. The membrane solutions we consider have in general nonvanishing angular momenta both in AdS 4 and Q1, 1, 1 spaces. We present solutions for folded and wrapped membranes. According to the AdS/CFT correspondence, such classical solutions are dual to long operators of the dual conformal field theories in the large coupling limit. We analyze the asymptotic behaviour of the dispersion relation between energy (conformal dimension) and angular momenta (global charges).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".