Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo trata de presentar una panorámica de la evolución socio-económica reciente de la sociedad canadiense, desde una óptica principalmente, pero no exclusivamente, económica. Partiendo de la clasificación de Canadá por ¡as Naciones Unidas como el primer país en desarrollo humano y el mantenimiento de la misma durante más de un lustro, se pretende identificar algunos de los elementos que han conducido a esta satisfactoria situación. Desde ésta, se revisa la evolución de la economía durante los últimos años, en el marco del modelo de política económica establecido en 1 984 y que continúa constituyendo el sustrato básico de la orientación de la economía de este país. Se incluye la consideración del impacto del Tratado de Libre Comercio. Se observan algunos elementos que producen cierta inquietud acerca de la marcha de la economía canadiense y de su capacidad para sostener nivel y calidad de vida alcanzado por su población, concluyendo en la necesidad e importancia de una democracia activa para el mantenimiento de los importantes logros obtenidos por la sociedad cae hasta ahora. Palabras clave: Economía de Canadá, Tratado Libre Comercio, dinámica social, movimientos sociales. ______________________ _____________________________________This article tries to present a panoramic view of the socio-economic evolution of Canadian society, mainly from an economic viewpoint but not exclusively. Starting from the classification by the United Nations of Canada as the first country in the world on Human Development and its maintenance in this ranking for six years now, it is aimed at identifying some of the elements that lead to this satisfactory situation. From there a revision of the evolution of its economic is intended within the framework of the policy model established in 1984 and that it is still the basis of present day policy. Consideration of the impact of the Free Trade Agreement is included. Some worrying hints about the capacity of the Canadian economy to support the level and quality of life attained by its population are detected concluding that an active democratic involvement of the population is of paramount importance to maintain the very important achievements of Canadian society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".