MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1730190060 · doi:10.2147/orr.s8592

Update on the management of Dupuytren’s contracture

2010· article· en· W1730190060 on OpenAlexafffund
Linda Vi, David B. O’Gorman, Bing Siang Gan

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopedic Research and Reviews · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityHand and Upper Limb ClinicLawson Health Research Institute
FundersInstitute of Musculoskeletal Health and ArthritisCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMuscle contractureMedicineEtiologyDiseasePresentation (obstetrics)DermatologyPathologicalContractureDupuytren's contractureIncidence (geometry)SurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Dupuytren’s disease (DD) is a pathological condition of the palmar fascia that is characterized by the formation of tight collagenous disease cords leading to permanent finger contractures. The disease is most prevalent in Caucasian men, and its incidence increases with age advancement. The most common complaint from patients having DD is the impairment of normal hand function. At present, the disease is incurable and the pathophysiology of DD is unknown. The most common treatment for DD is surgery; however, this treatment is associated with a high rate of recurrence. More recently, researchers have begun to explore the molecular basis of DD in the hopes of developing new, more effective treatment for DD. This review will summarize the history and clinical presentation of the disease, highlight current and emerging molecular treatments, and explore the implications of these advancements for future work. Keywords: Dupuytren’s disease, etiology, clinical presentation, treatment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopedic Research and ReviewsSame topicDupuytren's Contracture and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207