MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1730840496 · doi:10.7202/015981ar

« Langue », « communauté » et « identité »

2007· article· fr· W1730840496 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Monica Heller

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyEthnologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parmi les concepts clés de l’anthropologie linguistique (et de ses disciplines soeurs, la sociolinguistique, la sociologie du langage, la psychologie sociale du langage, l’aménagement linguistique) on trouve depuis longtemps ceux de « langue », « communauté » et « identité ». Ces concepts centraux pour la discipline émergent comme partie du discours du nationalisme étatique, et y sont profondément imbriqués. Dans cet article, je trace les grandes lignes de cette imbrication, pour examiner par la suite comment le travail de recherche sur la langue, l’identité et l’appartenance a pris forme dans les débats sur le français au Canada, et surtout pour ce qui est de la construction du nationalisme franco-canadien et de son évolution postnationaliste de nos jours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207