Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El documento desarrolla la idea de la necesidad de una ontología genérica que pueda contener fundamentos explicativos tanto para el campo de las ciencias naturales como para las ciencias aplicadas y sociales. Al enfoque ontológico, derivado principalmente del pensamiento filosófico y científico quizá más tradicional, se suma la perspectiva de la ontología de sistemas (de orientación computacional) que ha intentado construir un lenguaje que permita entregar fundamentos universales y derivaciones para dominios específicos. En este debateel autor propone avanzar de la socorrida visión antropocéntrica hacia una ontología cósmica que vincule la realidad cuántica, que tiene implicaciones fuertes en las innovaciones de las ciencias computacionales y de la información. La reflexión respecto de estos nuevos horizontes de la ontología permite vaticinar importantes giros reflexivos para la ciencia contable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it