Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Northern Review #23 (Summer 2001): 82-102.Indeed, hunting, fishing and gathering food is central to all indigenous peoples' survival.It is perhaps felt most poignantly in the thousands of communities scattered across the northern Polar Regions of our planet.The threat that all of the Arctic's indigenous peoples feel to their culture, their language, to their heritage and to their environment is intimately connected to the fear we all have regarding our inherent rights to hunting, fishing, and gathering.-Aqqaluk Lynge (of Greenland), President, Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC); Remarks at the National Forum on the Future of Alaska Natives (1999) Sadly, I know that too many of our colleagues only have passing familiarity of what we mean by subsistence.Subsistence is a word that many people use without really knowing what it means [to] the Native people of this land.Most Americans. . .think that subsistence means basic survival . . . .If you aren't familiar with the ways of Native people, you might not know that subsistence is more than just simple sustenance-it is a way of life.The gathering and harvesting of natural resources, by the natural Native people of this nation has been going on for thousands of years.Subsistence is so much a part of the fabric of native existence, that without it, there would be no culture, no tradition, perhaps no community, and certainly no means of giving expression to the spiritual aspects of Native life.-Daniel K. Inouye, US Senator, Hawaii.Remarks at the National Forum on the Future of Alaska Natives (1999)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".