MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1733616290

AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION OF NUMERICAL MAGNITUDE? EVIDENCE FROM JOINT DERIVATION OF SNARC AND SIZE CONGRUITY EFFECTS

2006· article· en· W1733616290 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Shaki, Daniel Algom, William M. Petrusic

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of Fechner Day · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNumeral systemArabic numeralsCognitionSet (abstract data type)Meaning (existential)Numerical cognitionJoint (building)Cognitive psychologyMagnitude (astronomy)Computer scienceArithmeticPsychologyMathematicsNeurosciencePhysicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A widely held assumption in the realm of numerical cognition states that the meaning (i.e., numerical magnitude) of numerals is automatically activated just whenever numerals are exposed for any purpose. Two markers of automatic activation have been the SNARC and the size congruity effect. In this study, we derived both effects on a common set of numerals for the same group of observers. We found the effects to be independent. These results invite a revision of the traditional interpretations of the SNARC as a marker of automatic activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of Fechner DaySame topicCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsFrench-language works237,207