MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1733912711

Effects of energy conservation and saturation in Mueller's dipole cascade formulation

2005· article· en· W1733912711 on OpenAlexaff
Gösta Gustafson

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications (Lund University) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDipolePhysicsEnergy conservationCascadeSaturation (graph theory)GluonQuantum chromodynamicsLambdaConservation of energyCoordinate spaceConservation lawScatteringQuantum electrodynamicsAtomic physicsNuclear physicsComputational physicsParticle physicsChemistryQuantum mechanicsMathematicsGeometryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of energy conservation and saturation are studied in the coordinate space dipole formulation for QCD cascades. Preliminary results for dipole-dipole and dipole-nucleus scattering are presented. Very large effects are obtained from energy conservation, corresponding to a factor similar to 10 in the cross section and similar to 3 in lambda(eff). Some results on the gluon fusion process g + g --> g are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLund University Publications (Lund University)Same topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207