MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1734004728

Severity of single vehicle crashes during holidays

2012· article· en· W1734004728 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sabreena Anowar, Shamsunnahar Yasmin, Richard Tay

Bibliographic record

VenueRMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrashPoison controlInjury preventionLogistic regressionTransport engineeringHuman factors and ergonomicsOccupational safety and healthEnvironmental healthMedicineForensic engineeringEngineeringComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research examined the effects of different contributing factors on the severity of single vehicle crashes occurring during holidays in the years 1999-2008 in Alberta, Canada. Urban and rural crashes were analyzed separately to isolate the location effects. Partially constrained generalized ordered logit models were estimated for each of the specified location types with three possible severity outcomes: property damage only, minor injury and serious injury. The authors' results indicated that time trend and stop/yield signs manifested contrasting effects on urban and rural location crash severity. No restraint use, driver violations and errors, irreparable vehicular damage, involvement of motorcycles, off-road crashes, driver's inebriation and presence of holes/bumps/ruts are some of the important variables that influenced rural crash severity. On the other hand, no restraint use, irreparable vehicular damage, involvement of motorcycles and elderly drivers, drivers being drunk or fatigued, and off-road crashes are some of the important variables that influenced urban crash severity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library)Same topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207