MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1734166017 · doi:10.1002/cpe.3160

Supporting multidimensional range queries in Hierarchically Distributed Tree

2013· article· en· W1734166017 on OpenAlexafffund
Yunfeng Gu, Azzedine Boukerche, Robson E. De Grande

Bibliographic record

VenueConcurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceOverlayDistributed computingOverlay networkRange query (database)Routing (electronic design automation)Tree (set theory)Load balancing (electrical power)Network topologyRange (aeronautics)Set (abstract data type)Process (computing)Computer networkInformation retrievalMathematicsGrid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary An examination of the multidimensional range query in existing peer‐to‐peer (P2P) overlay networks indicates that multidimensional range queries are sensitive to underlying topologies; this is because partitioning and mapping of multidimensional data space are two interconnected parts of a process that must be carried out cooperatively. The first section focuses on how to preserve data localities, whereas the second section concerns how to accommodate and maintain data localities at the P2P overlay layer. There are many studies that have been conducted on the first section since 1966, and those works that are well accepted are mostly based on recursive decomposition, which forms a tree structure in nature. However, less effort has been made to provide comparable support from the P2P overlay layer. In our previous work, we proposed the Hierarchically Distributed Tree (HD Tree) in order to better support multidimensional range queries in the P2P overlay network. This paper further explores error‐resilient routing and load balancing strategies that can be employed in the HD Tree. We also provide a complete set of experimental results for all routing operations: Join and Leave of nodes, range queries at different levels of selectivity, and the dynamic load balancing scheme. Comparisons are made by conducting simulations under both the ideal and the error‐prone routing environment and within various ary HD Trees. The experimental results show that load balancing in the HD Tree can be adjusted dynamically and globally, and it is actually a trade‐off between distributing the basic load and the involvement of nodes in range querying. The experimental results also indicate that a maximum of 10 percent of routing nodes’ failures do not have significant effects on the performance of range queries. However, a lower ary HD Tree appears to have better routing performance, whereas a higher ary HD Tree achieves a higher fault‐tolerant capacity. Nevertheless, the performance of range queries in a higher ary HD Tree can be further optimized if all possible routing options can be fully explored in the error‐prone routing environment. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcurrency and Computation Practice and ExperienceSame topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207