MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1734318899 · doi:10.3968/4417

The Research on the Path to Eradicate Poverty for NGOs in a New Period

2014· article· en· W1734318899 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mengzhu Li, Zhizhang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in sociology of science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyObstacleGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthLift (data mining)Political scienceDevelopment economicsBusinessEconomicsComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper starts with advantages of participating in poverty alleviation of the NGOs, indicate the advantages the NGOs possess are the supplements to the government-led poverty alleviation so as to illustrate that it is necessary to participate in poverty alleviation for the NGOs. On the basis of discussing the main actions that NGOs take, the paper examines the obstacle of the participation and analyses the reasons, lastly designs a path to promote the NGOs to participate in the pro-poor activities, aiming to popularize the pattern to lift the poverty-alleviation efficiency, promote the impoverished to shake off poverty and become better off, and achieve the goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way lastly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.028
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in sociology of scienceSame topicTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207