Bibliographic record
Abstract
The two civil wars from 1642 to 1648 proved to be calamitous for the cause of divine right monarchy in England. Filmer's greatest fears about the parliamentary radicalism in the mixed regime theories of Hunton and Parker, the latter eventually becoming a secretary of state under Cromwell, were realized in the regicide and the establishment of the Commonwealth in 1649. Filmer lived to see not only the triumph of Calvinist and Independent resisters over crown and church, but also the utter implosion of Charles and the moderate royalists' argument for mixed monarchy when a radicalized Parliament assumed the full right of sovereignty as the sole representative of the nation. The postwar period also, however, saw the publication in 1652 of the nothing if not resilient Filmer's Observations concerning the Originall of Government , the greatest portion of which composed an extended critique of Hugo Grotius' De Jure Belli ac Pacis and Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan . With this substantial offering in the closing years of his life, Filmer's work took on a somewhat new direction. Whereas his prior efforts had focused primarily on the Catholic natural law and the Calvinist-influenced parliamentary resisters, now near the end of his career Filmer trained his sights on the two most prominent natural law and natural rights theorists of the period. Unlike his Catholic and Calvinist theological opponents of years past, Filmer's new antagonists in the natural liberty school did not fuse their arguments for consent with the principle of divine ordination of political power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".