MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1734860066 · doi:10.1139/p00-018

Étude magnétique des matériaux de type Ln<sub>2</sub>M<sub>12</sub>P<sub>7</sub> (Ln = Ce, Sm, Gd et Er; M = Co et Fe)

2000· article· en· W1734860066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Dhahri, N. Fourati, E. Dhahri

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParamagnetismPhysicsMagnetic momentSaturation (graph theory)MagnetizationAntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsCurie–Weiss lawCurie temperatureMagnetic fieldMagnetic susceptibilityLanthanideIonNuclear magnetic resonanceFerromagnetism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A magnetic study has been undertaken on the substances of formula Ln2M12X7. The magnetic susceptibility and the magnetization have been measured as a function of temperature for a constant field. The magnetic susceptibility measurements have been performed from ambient temperature up to 1000 K. The effective paramagnetic moments were deduced from 1 / χ = f(T) curves, assuming a zero moment on the transition metal atoms. It is shown that these values are in good agreement with the theoretical values calculated for the free ions Ln3+. The saturation moment and the paramagnetic Curie temperature values show an antiferromagnetic behavior for Ce2Co12P7 at low temperature. The magnetic moment of Sm2Co12P7 measured at 4.2 and 78 K under a 2.66 T magnetic field shows a complex magnetic structure at low temperature. Our work on these materials show that the magnetic properties of Ln2M12X7 could be interpreted from previous studies on the phases rare earth – transition metal Ln–M.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207