Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite du parcours des politiques environnementalistes concernant les traditions tutélaires de l’indigénisme au Brésil, d’une perspective « interne » acquise par l’auteur au cours de son travail au sein du gouvernement dans le domaine de l’environnement et de l’indigénisme. Il prend comme point de départ les pratiques de subordination séculaires de la représentation politique indigène dans les sphères étatiques pour développer différents degrés d’analyse. Le résultat est une lecture historique de l’indigénisme tutélaire et de l’environnementalisme conservationniste pratiqués au Brésil, en passant par la création de l’État-nation, la domination des peuples et des terres, la disciplinarisation du milieu rural indigène et environnemental, ainsi que par l’internationalisation des programmes environnementaux : des étapes qui représentent tant l’arrièreplan que la structure du dialogue interethnique actuel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".