MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W173598990 · doi:10.4337/9781849801928

Research Companion to Corruption in Organizations

2009· book· en· W173598990 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanguage changePolitical scienceBusinessCriminologyPsychologyLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents: Introduction: Corruption in Organizations: Causes, Consequences and Choices Ronald J. Burke PART I: CAUSES OF CORRUPTION 1. Greed Ronald J. Burke 2. Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Misconduct in Organizations: What do we (believe that we) know, and on what bases do we (believe that we) know it? Joel Lefkowitz 3. Research on Corruption and Unethical Behavior in Organizations: The Use of Conjoint Analysis Robert Folger, Robert Pritchard, Rebecca L. Greenbaum and Deborah DiazGranados 4. The Escalation of Corruption in Organizations Stelios C. Zyglidopoulos and Peter Fleming PART II: CONSEQUENCES OF CORRUPTION 5. Labour Relations and Ethical Dilemmas of Extractive MNEs in Nigeria, South Africa and Zambia Gabriel Eweje 6. On the Corruption of Scientists: The Influence of Field, Environment, and Personality Michael D. Mumford, Alison L. Antes, Cheryl Beeler and Jay J. Caughron PART III: INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHOICES 7. A Comparative Perspective on Corruption: Kantian, Utilitarian or Virtue? Rosa Chun 8. Ethical Leadership R. Edward Freeman, Brian Moriarty and Lisa A. Stewart 9. Corruption, Outrage and Whistleblowing Brian Martin 10. Organizational Responses to Allegations of Corporate Corruption Vikas Anand, Alan Ellstrand, Aparna Rajagopalan and Mahendra Joshi 11. Reducing Employee Theft: Weighing the Evidence on Intervention Effectiveness Edward C. Tomlinson 12. Corporate Ethical Codes as a Vehicle of Reducing Corruption in Organizations Betsy Stevens 13. Transparency International: Global Franchising and the War of Information Against Corruption Luis de Sousa and Peter Larmour 14. Canadian Corporate Corruption L.S. Rosen Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it