MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1738253386 · doi:10.1029/2011wr011425

Effects of non‐Gaussian copula‐based hydraulic conductivity fields on macrodispersion

2012· article· en· W1738253386 on OpenAlexaff
Claus Haslauer, Philipp Guthke, András Bàrdossy, Edward A. Sudicky

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic conductivityVariogramGaussianGeostatisticsIsotropySoil scienceSpatial dependenceHydrogeologyGeologySpatial variabilityAquiferStatistical physicsMathematicsGeotechnical engineeringKrigingStatisticsGroundwaterPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is an application of a spatial copula model that is fitted to a real world data set. The copula model allows modeling of pure spatial dependence independently of the marginal distribution. Using non‐Gaussian copula models it is demonstrated that the spatial dependence structure of the Borden aquifer is significantly non‐Gaussian—despite the fact that the Borden aquifer is commonly thought of as a relatively homogeneous porous medium with a small variance of hydraulic conductivity. In addition to evaluating the spatial dependence structure of the Borden hydraulic conductivity data set using copulas, goal of this study is to explore if the structure of the hydraulic conductivity field influences a physical property, such as plume evolution as evaluated by second spatial central moments of concentration fields. For this comparison, two types of hydraulic conductivity fields were fitted to the Borden hydraulic conductivity data set: one with a Gaussian and the other with a non‐Gaussian type of dependence. These two types of hydraulic conductivity fields were constructed such that their second‐order spatial moments are identical, and hence they cannot be distinguished by semivariogram‐based geostatistics. This paper illustrates that the spatial dependence structure of the Borden hydraulic conductivity data set is significantly non‐Gaussian. Despite the fact that Borden is a relatively homogeneous porous medium, and despite the fact that both types of spatial fields are not distinguishable by their variograms, the solute transport characteristics based on these two types of isotropic fields differ significantly in two‐dimensional settings. The difference is less pronounced in three‐dimensions with anisotropy. It is postulated that non‐Gaussian spatial dependence of hydraulic conductivity and a more skewed marginal distribution of hydraulic conductivity will have significant implications in the other more heterogeneous aquifers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207