Invasive measurements of atrioventricular conduction parameters prior to and following ventricular septal defect closure with the amplatzer device.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because of anatomical proximity, closure of paramembranous ventricular septal defect (pm-VSD) with an Amplatzer occluder has the potential to affect the atrioventricular (AV) conduction system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Electrophysiology studies (EPS) were performed prior to and following closure of the pm-VSD in 19 children aged 8.9 +/- 4.5 years. Data from electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring and exercise tests before intervention and at follow up (1.9 +/- 0.8 years) were reviewed. RESULTS: There were no EPS catheter-induced complications. Incidence of total conduction anomalies was 31.6% with 21% of patients having permanent conduction anomalies. Complete AV block was not recorded in any subject and transitory 1st-degree AV block occurred in 2 patients. Permanent complete right bundle branch block was observed in 2 patients and incomplete right bundle branch block in 2 others. Prolongation in EPS parameters was significant for His ventricle interval (p = 0.017). Otherwise, EPS parameters with increased measurements > 15% were observed in 18 patients (95%). Prolongation of retrograde Wenckebach cycle length was predictive of new onset conduction abnormalities (p = 0.003). Other parameters changes did not correlate with the observed conduction disturbances however. With respect to device implantation characteristics, a large Amplatzer device was the only predictive risk factor for new conduction abnormalities (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Closure of pm-VSD with an Amplatzer device promotes relative changes of the AV conduction system, mainly with large devices. In our limited series, these changes have no apparent clinical impact in the immediate and intermediate terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".