Tubular daylighting devices. Part I: Development of an optical model (1415-RP)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tubular daylighting devices are systems that collect and channel daylight from building roofs into deep interior spaces. To meet high standards of building energy efficiency and glare-free indoor environments, tubular daylighting device technologies have been rapidly and continuously evolving over the past two decades. However, this pace has been counteracted by a lack of reliable computer design tools. This article presents the development of analytical models to compute the optical characteristics (transmittance, reflectance, and layer absorptances) of various types of complex tubular daylighting devices New metrics for the optical and lighting performance are developed. The optical models are based on the ray-tracing technique, and account for the spectral (monochromatic) or broad-band optical properties of tubular daylighting device glazing panes. Experimental validation of these models is presented in an accompanying paper (Laouadi et al., Citation2013c).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it