MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1741475125 · doi:10.21831/jpipfip.v8i1.4924

ETOS BELAJAR SISWA SEKOLAH DI DAERAH PINGGIRAN

2015· article· id· W1741475125 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL PENELITIAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan ingin mengetahui dan menganalisis penyebab rendahnya etosbelajar siswa dari perspektif sosial budaya, dan menawarkan solusi yang efektif bagi upayameningkatkan etos belajar siswa di daerah pinggiran. Pilihan metode penelitian adalahmetode survei dan penelitian kancah (field research). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwaetos belajar siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas/Kejuruan (SMA/SMK) di daerah pinggiranternyata masih dalam kategori sedang cenderung rendah. Indikatornya adalah bahwadikalangan siswa sekolah pinggiran ditandai rendahnya minat baca, kurang menyukaitantangan atau rendahnya watak kompetitif, rendahnya kemandirian, tanggung jawabbelajar yang tidak tinggi. Letak teritorial cenderung memiliki hubungan signifikanterhadap rendahnya etos belajar siswa di sekolah pinggiran dan terdapat hubungan yangtidak linier antara persepsi positif terhadap belajar dengan praksis belajar di kalangansiswa sekolah daerah pinggiran

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it