From Self-Reform to Social Reform: a Study of Thoreau’s Social and Political Thoughts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the importance of his social and political thoughts, Henry David Thoreau is mostly studied as a writer of Transcendentalism and nature writings. Actually, Thoreau expresses many important ideas on social and political problems in his works. Through reading Thoreau’s main political writings, this essay attempts to comment on his social and political thoughts from its four constitutive aspects, i.e., self-reform as the basis of social reform, strategies and forms of passive resistance, critique of the division of labor and emphasis on the importance of action. It argues that the significance of Thoreau’s social and political thoughts lies in his insight in seeing the consistent relationship between the individual self-reform and social justice and political democracy. In other words, both individual and social reforms are important means in correcting social injustice and nourishing political democracy. Key words: Thoreau, self-reform, social reform, passive resistance, division of labor Resume: Malgre l’importance de sa pensee sociale et politique, Henry David Thoreau est surtout etudie comme un ecrivain de Transcendantalisme et de Litterature naturelle. Effectivement, Thoreau exprime beaucoupe d’idees importantes sur des problemes sociaux et politiques dans ses oeuvres. Par la lecture des principales oeuvres politiques de Thoreau, cet essai tente de commenter sur les 4 aspects constitutifs, c’est-a-dire la reforme du soi comme la base de la reforme sociale, strategies et formes de la resistance passive, critiques sur la division du travail et accentuation sur l’importance de l’action. Il demontre que la signification de sa penee socoale et politique existe dans sa perspicacite de voir la relation consistante entre la reforme du soi de l’individu, la justice sociale et la democratie politique. Autrement dit, les reformes individuelles et sociales sont toutes importantes dans la correction de l’injustice sociale et dans la formation de la democratie politique. Mots-Cles: Thoreau, reforme du soir, reforme sociale, resistance passive, division du travail
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.060 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".