Structural analysis of <i>Francisella tularensis</i> lipopolysaccharide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure of the lipid A and core region of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Francisella tularensis (ATCC 29684) was analysed using NMR, mass spectrometry and chemical methods. The LPS contains a beta-GlcN-(1-6)-GlcN lipid A backbone, but has a number of unusual structural features; it apparently has no substituent at O-1 of the reducing end GlcN residue in the lipid part in the major part of the population, no substituents at O-3 and O-4 of beta-GlcN, and no substituent at O-4 of the Kdo residue. The largest oligosaccharide, isolated after strong alkaline deacylation of NaBH4 reduced LPS had the following structure: where Delta-GalNA-(1-3)-beta-QuiNAc represents a modified fragment of the O-chain repeating unit. Two shorter oligosaccharides lacking the O-chain fragment were also identified. A minor amount of the disaccharide beta-GlcN-(1-6)-alpha-GlcN-1-P was isolated from the same reaction mixture, indicating the presence of free lipid A, unsubstituted by Kdo and with phosphate at the reducing end. The lipid A, isolated from the products of mild acid hydrolysis, had the structure 2-N-(3-O-acyl4-acyl2)-beta-GlcN-(1-6)-2-N-acyl1-3-O-acyl3-GlcN where acyl1, acyl2 and acyl3 are 3-hydroxyhexadecanoic or 3-hydroxyoctadecanoic acids, acyl4 is tetradecanoic or (minor) hexadecanoic acids. No phosphate substituents were found in this compound. OH-1 of the reducing end glucosamine, and OH-3 and OH-4 of the nonreducing end glucosamine residues were not substituted. LPS of F. tularensis exhibits unusual biological properties, including low endoxicity, which may be related to its unusual lipid A structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".