"National Significance": The Evolution and Development of Acquisition Strategies in the Manuscript Division, National Archives of Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les questions relies l'acquisition de documents privs ainsi qu' leur importance nationale furent une proccupation constante dans le secteur des archives multiculturelles et, plus gnralement, dans le domaine des archives sociales et culturelles.Cet article dcrit l'volution des diverses tentatives de la Division des manuscrits des Archives nationales du Canada pour trouver des rponses ces questions.Il examine aussi quelques-unes des pressions, venues tant que l'intrieur que de l'extrieur des Archives nationales, pour produire des solutions acceptables.En l'absence de solutions appropries, l'accent peut quelquefois tre mis sur le processus et les procdures.L'auteur de cet article a particip ces efforts mais en fut galement un observateur attentif et intress.ABSTRACT Questions relating to acquisition of private records and "national significance" have been a constant preoccupation in the area of multicultural archives and, more generally, in the area of social and cultural archives.This article describes the evolution of the various attempts to provide answers to these questions in the Manuscript Division of the National Archives of Canada.It looks at some of the pressures to produce generally acceptable solutions from both within and outside the National Archives.In the absence of appropriate solutions, emphasis may shift to process and procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it