Os desafios de compreender o trabalho informal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Os autores analisam as modificações do mundo do trabalho a partir da crise do modelo fordista no final dos "trinta gloriosos" anos do pósguerra. O uso intensivo de tecnologia, a abertura de mercados globalizados, a financeirização do capital e as modernas técnicas de gestão e planejamento do novo modo de acumulação flexível alteram a composição, a qualidade e a quantidade do emprego colocando em risco o assalariamento formal como paradigma social. A flexibilidade e a precarização dos contratos disseminam modalidades informais de trabalho, como recurso de sobrevivência para uma parcela não residual de trabalhadores. São debatidos os conceitos de "setor informal", as várias correntes que abordam o fenômeno da informalidade nos países de terceiro mundo e pesquisas de campo já realizadas sobre o segmento. Na conclusão afirmam a importância do trabalho informal para a geração de renda, empregos e para a manutenção da coesão social, principalmente em face de sua existência subordinada intersticialmente ao modo de acumulação dominante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".