MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Os desafios de compreender o trabalho informal

2009· article· pt· W1744933284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSER Social · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os autores analisam as modificações do mundo do trabalho a partir da crise do modelo fordista no final dos "trinta gloriosos" anos do pósguerra. O uso intensivo de tecnologia, a abertura de mercados globalizados, a financeirização do capital e as modernas técnicas de gestão e planejamento do novo modo de acumulação flexível alteram a composição, a qualidade e a quantidade do emprego colocando em risco o assalariamento formal como paradigma social. A flexibilidade e a precarização dos contratos disseminam modalidades informais de trabalho, como recurso de sobrevivência para uma parcela não residual de trabalhadores. São debatidos os conceitos de "setor informal", as várias correntes que abordam o fenômeno da informalidade nos países de terceiro mundo e pesquisas de campo já realizadas sobre o segmento. Na conclusão afirmam a importância do trabalho informal para a geração de renda, empregos e para a manutenção da coesão social, principalmente em face de sua existência subordinada intersticialmente ao modo de acumulação dominante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it