MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1746249203 · doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.869

Infinite loop spaces and nilpotent K–theory

2017· article· en· W1746249203 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgebraic & Geometric Topology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommutative propertyLoop (graph theory)NilpotentFiltration (mathematics)Class (philosophy)Term (time)Limit (mathematics)Loop space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a construction derived from the descending central series of the free groups, we produce filtrations by infinite loop spaces of the classical infinite loop spaces [math] , [math] , [math] , [math] , [math] , [math] and [math] . We show that these infinite loop spaces are the zero spaces of nonunital [math] –ring spectra. We introduce the notion of [math] –nilpotent K–theory of a CW–complex [math] for any [math] , which extends the notion of commutative K–theory defined by Adem and Gómez, and show that it is represented by [math] , where [math] is the [math] term of the aforementioned filtration of [math] . ¶ For the proof we introduce an alternative way of associating an infinite loop space to a commutative [math] –monoid and give criteria for when it can be identified with the plus construction on the associated limit space. Furthermore, we introduce the notion of a commutative [math] –rig and show that they give rise to nonunital [math] –ring spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it