MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1746594260 · doi:10.1109/icdar.1997.620656

A knowledge-based image understanding environment for document processing

2002· article· en· W1746594260 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Li, Marc Lalonde, Eric Reiher, J.-F. Rizand, Chunshen Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceImage processingKnowledge-based systemsReuseKnowledge engineeringArtificial intelligenceKnowledge acquisitionInferenceContext (archaeology)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionProblem statementInference engineImage (mathematics)Object (grammar)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CRIM Image Mining Environment (CIME) is an image understanding environment integrated with knowledge engineering technologies. The image understanding technology developed for CIME supports recognition tasks such as symbol recognition, contour line recognition, and general image processing operations. CIME is composed of an Object Model Description Language (OMDL) which allows for the semantic description of knowledge about objects and their context, an inference engine which performs image understanding based on the model descriptions in OMDL to achieve the recognition of complex objects, and a task builder which allows for the acquisition of image understanding knowledge and helps the application designer to build strategies for solving application problems through knowledge reuse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207