MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1746824038 · doi:10.5339/qfarc.2014.eepp0099

Environmental Fate Modelling Of Contaminants In Constructed Wetlands

2014· article· en· W1746824038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Al-Marri, Mohamad Yacob Al-Sulaiti, Frank A. P. C. Gobas, Alexander M. Cancelli

Bibliographic record

VenueQatar Foundation Annual Research Conference Proceedings Volume 2014 Issue 1 · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandEnvironmental scienceBioaccumulationBiotaContaminationEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryConstructed wetlandReusePollutantSurface waterWastewaterEcologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Water management is a key focus area globally, and especially for the state of Qatar given its extremely arid environment. As such, research to develop technologies to enhance beneficial re-use of treated industrial waste water is recognized as a key challenge in this region. As a part of the Water Re-Use Research Program at ExxonMobil Research Qatar, a model was developed in collaboration with Simon Fraser University (Canada) for predicting the environmental fate of contaminants in constructed wetlands. Objective: This work will aid in design and monitoring of engineered wetlands to support water reuse applications. Methods: This model provides a method to estimate the extent to which contaminants of various kinds can be expected to be removed from wetlands through a combination of transformation and transport processes under various environmental conditions and wetland characteristics. The model was constructed to represent steady-state conditions and is based on conservation of mass principles. The model was developed for the use of Type I and Type II chemicals. Type I chemicals include organic substances and Type II chemicals include trace metals and inorganic substances .The model combines calculations for (i) environmental distribution of contaminants in aquatic systems; (ii) uptake, translocation and biotransformation of contaminants in vegetation; (iii) bioaccumulation in aquatic biota of wetlands; and (iv) toxicity in aquatic biota. Model inputs include wetland characteristics (e.g. compartment volumes, dimensions, organic carbon content, biotic growth rates); environmental conditions (e.g. Inflow& temperature); contaminant properties (e.g. molecular weight, degradation half-lives). The model outputs include predicted concentrations in various wetland compartments and mass balance inventory characterizing mass distribution and various loss processes. Results: Application of the model was tested for pyrene, arsenic and a naphthenic acid. The results show distinct differences in the predicted ability of wetlands to remove these contaminants from waste water. Conclusion: The evaluative model presented in this study provides useful insights that can guide further studies for designing and monitoring the effectiveness of engineered wetlands for wastewater reclamation purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQatar Foundation Annual Research Conference Proceedings Volume 2014 Issue 1Same topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207