MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Theoretical Foundation and Disciplinary Construction of Chinese Historical Financial Geography: A Case Study of Financial Geography in Sichuan- Chongqing Region During the Late Qing and the Republic of China Era

2014· article· en· W1748154095 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chengbin Luan

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaVitalityGeography of financeStrategic geographyHistorical geographyAgricultural geographyGeographyScope (computer science)DisciplineEconomic geographyRegional scienceHuman geographyEconomyPolitical scienceFinanceSocial scienceEconomicsFinancial marketSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a branch of economic geography, the theoretical origins of financial geography are multiple, which increasingly shows the vitality and advantages of interdiscipline. As an important component of economic geography, the research contents and measures of China’s historical economic geography have been continuously expanding in recent years with the development of times, which is a major feature of rising discipline. During its development process, China’s economic geography has been subject to many influences including the former Soviet Union and other Western economic geographical ideas, it is possible and also necessary to critically use the still growing Western economic geographical ideas for reference in China’s economic geographical research, scope of such research should include regional finance of historical periods, in this sense, the research of financial geography in Sichuan-Chongqing region in modern times, which has relatively strong regional change characteristics and practical reference value, is undoubtedly a valuable research content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicRegional Economics and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207