Characterization of Polymeric Membranes Under Large Deformations Using Fluid-Structure Coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanical properties of Ogden material under biaxial deformation are obtained by using the bubble inflation technique. First, pressure inside the bubble and height at the hemispheric pole are recorded during bubble inflation experiment. Thereafter, Ogden's theory of hyperelasticity is employed to define the constitutive model of flat circular thermoplastic membranes (CTPMs) and nonlinear equilibrium equations of the inflation process are solved using finite difference method with deferred corrections. As a last step, a neuronal algorithm artificial neural network (ANN) model is employed to minimize the difference between calculated and measured parameters to determine material constants for Ogden model. This technique was successfully implemented for acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), at typical thermoforming temperatures, 145°C. When solving for the bubble inflation, the recorded pressure is applied uniformly on the structure. During the process inflation, the pressure is not uniform inside the bubble, thus full gas dynamic equations need to be solved to get the appropriate nonuniform pressure to be applied on the structure. In order to simulate the inflation process accurately, computational fluid dynamics in a moving fluid domain as well as fluid structure interaction (FSI) algorithms need to be performed for accurate pressure prediction and fluid structure interface coupling. Fluid structure interaction solver is then required to couple the dynamic of the inflated gas to structure motion. Recent development has been performed for the simulation of gas dynamic in a moving domain using arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".