MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Substitution of Coke and Energy Saving in Blast Furnaces. Part 1. Characteristics of Technology and Uneven Processes―Cognition, Calculation, Forecast

2013· article· en· W1748249271 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
I. G. Tovarovskiy

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy science and technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIron and Steelmaking Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlast furnaceCokeMass transferWork (physics)Heat transferSmeltingEnergy consumptionProcess (computing)Energy conservationMechanicsMechanical engineeringProcess engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceMetallurgyWaste managementPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blast melting is one of the few industrial technologies that preserve the essence and significance by all technical revolutions. This phenomenon exists due to certain properties of the system that ensures exponentially increasing the productivity and linearly lowering the coke rate, that seeks to 200-250 kg/thm. The solution of problems of blast-furnace smelting involves the solution of two analytical tasks: study of the relationship of real parameters and characteristics of the blast melting; forecast of expected parameters and processes on preset parameters of work of the blast melting. The first task is solved on the basis of balance equations of conservation of mass and energy, the second-based on the method of numerical modeling of processes in radial annular cross-sections along the height of the furnace: multi-zone model of heat-and mass transfer; physico-chemical transformations and mechanics of material and gases. During the numerical and analytical investigation it was shown that the peripheral part of the blast furnace is characterized by the minimum process of direct reduction and also shown that the uniform distribution of burden load provides the minimum fuel consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy science and technologySame topicIron and Steelmaking ProcessesFrench-language works237,207