MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1749047606

Archives, Life Cycles, and Death Wishes: A Helical Model of Record Formation

2006· article· en· W1749047606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesDepictionPhilosophyIdentity (music)ArtLiteratureAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte labore le modle d'un concept de cration de documents ( record formation ).En partant d'une analyse des qualits temporelles du cycle de vie dans la pratique archivistique, il montre ensuite comment le parler mtaphorique et les concepts de vie auxquels les archivistes souscrivent sont venus appuyer la pense et la pratique archivistique tout en les limitant. partir de cette critique, le texte propose qu'une figure hlicodale, base sur certaines ides mdivales au sujet de la mort, de la rsurrection et de l'identit humaine, nous permet de constituer un modle temporel capable de mieux disposer les dynamiques complexes relatives la cration de documents.La forme spirale caractristique de la figure hlicodale permet la reprsentation de la cration de documents comme un acte qui se droule simultanment de faon linaire et non-linaire.Le texte soutient alors que ce concept de la cration de documents est plus en mesure d'noncer les phnomnes documentaires de vie et de mort que les archivistes rencontrent et influencent dans leur travail que ne le font des notions comme document , gestion de documents et essence du document ( recordness ).ABSTRACT This article develops a model of a concept of record formation.Beginning with an analysis of the temporal qualities of the life cycle in archival practice, it goes on to show how the metaphorical language and concepts of life to which archivists are beholden, have empowered archival thought and practice, but also imprisoned them.Proceeding from this critique, the article then proposes that a helical figure, developed from certain medieval ideas of death, resurrection, and human identity, enables us to develop a temporal model that better accommodates the complex dynamics of "record formations."The characteristic coiled shape of helical figures permits the depiction of record formation as simultaneously unfolding in a linear and non-linear fashion.The article argues that the concept of record formation better articulates the life-and-death documentary phenomena archivists encounter and influence in their work than do such notions as "record," "record-keeping" and "recordness."First, then, in my judgment, we must make a distinction and ask, what is that which always is and has no becoming, and what is that which is always becoming and never is? 1 Records are information presented in a static form.The act of recording "sets" 1 Plato, Timaeus. 236Archivaria 61 the information firmly in format on a medium or carrier.This characteristic renders records authentic and is especially important in electronic recordkeeping. 2 The life cycle model sees records passing through stages until they eventually "die," except for the "chosen ones" that are reincarnated as archives. 3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it