MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1750016530 · doi:10.3968/5176

The Numerical Simulation of Serious Flooded Area of Jin-45 Block

2014· article· en· W1750016530 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Duan Xiaowei

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)Computer simulationPetroleum engineeringEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionBlock (permutation group theory)Steam injectionEngineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental engineeringGeotechnical engineeringSimulationMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The serious flooded area of Jin-45 Block began trial mining in 1984, Expericing conventional dry pumping, steam stimulation test and large-scale steam stimulation [1-2] . After nearly 30 years’ development with active edge and bottom water and sufficient energy, there is a high percentage of reserves and the plane and vertical plane encryption, can’t be adjusted. The condition of edge and bottom water is serious, average recovery rate of water of producing wells is high, production decline amplitude increase, exposing a series of problems. Referring to the steam stimulation turn to steam drive experience of pilot test area, building geologic model with Petrel software, setting up edge and bottom water reasonably, making history matching and project estimate, analyzing characteristics of steam flooding of the flooded area. Providing theoretical guidance and basis of turning to steam flooding of serious flooded area [4-6] . Key words : Flooding; Steam flooding; Numerical simulation; Optimization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207