Ectomycorrhizal hyphae structure components of the soil bacterial community for decreased phosphatase production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) provide nutrients to their hosts by means of hyphae that extend beyond nutrient-depleted rhizosphere soil. Soil bacteria may compete with EMF for nutrients or may act synergistically to enhance nutrient supply to hosts. To assess the interactions between hyphae and bacteria, two types of small, sand-filled mesh bags were incubated in a Pseudotsuga menziesii/Betula papyrifera forest. The bags allowed ingrowth by EMF (35-μm mesh) or excluded hyphae (0.5-μm mesh), while allowing migration of soil bacteria. After incubation, bacteria were isolated from bags using a method to enrich for Gram-positive bacteria. Isolates were assayed for phosphatase and N-acetyl glucosaminidase (NAGase) activities to assess the potential to access organic phosphorus and nitrogen. The average phosphatase activities were higher in exclusion than ingrowth bags, while NAGase activities did not differ. Streptomyces isolates, which are expected to be strong competitors and antagonists of EMF, were more prevalent in ingrowth bags and yet had lower phosphatase activities. Furthermore, there were no indications of antagonism between fungi and Streptomyces, as there were no increases in NAGase activities in ingrowth bags. We conclude that fungal hyphae can structure components of the soil bacterial community for decreased extracellular enzyme production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".