Study of the Impact of Social Media Technologies on Political Consciousness: Specifics of Russian Approaches
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the phenomenon of political consciousness and social media. The authors pay attention to existing approaches to study of political consciousness and modern social media in Russian science. According to this article Russian scientists actively consider the problems that are connected to social media. There is a number of works where authors consider terminological aspects of modern social media. There are also many investigations that are devoted to the problem of political consciousness. Russian scientists draw attention to modern social networks support platforms as tools of socialization and emphasize the need for the system-based theoretical and applied researches of political and social phenomenon of modern social networks support systems in Russia. The authors of this paper suppose that social media may enhance the feeling of modern Russians potential involvement in socio-political sphere. Moreover these media may contribute to changing political and social institutions perception by users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it