MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1750772963 · doi:10.1109/robot.2002.1013577

Emulation of a space robot using a hydraulic manipulator on ground

2003· article· en· W1750772963 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wen-Hong Zhu, Yves Gonthier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationRobotManipulator (device)Computer scienceSpace (punctuation)Control engineeringRobot manipulatorHydraulic machinerySimulationEngineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To verify the tasks of one of the Space Station manipulator, the Canadian Space Agency is developing a hardware-in-the-loop simulation system. A hydraulic robot manipulating mockup of the space payload reproduces the contact forces occurring during insertion and extraction. The control law allowing a good performance requires a very accurate torque tracking for the hydraulic robot. With good force sensing in the hydraulic cylinder the torque control can be achieved in constraint motion but not in free motion. A controller using a feedforward term to compensate the velocity related effect is presented and tested experimentally. It is shown that this controller achieves very good results both in free motion and in a constrained task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207