MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1750995033 · doi:10.1080/03081087.2015.1082960

Preservers of completely positive matrix rank

2015· article· en· W1750995033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLinear and Multilinear Algebra · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRank (graph theory)MathematicsCombinatoricsMatrix (chemical analysis)Set (abstract data type)Function (biology)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let denote the set of matrices with entries in . We write to denote the subset of , all of whose entries are non-negative. Let denote the set of all real symmetric matrices. A matrix is said to be completely positive if there is some matrix such that . The CP-rank of the matrix is the smallest such that for some . In this article, we shall investigate the linear operators on that preserve sets of matrices defined by the CP-rank. We classify those that preserve the CP-rank function, those that preserve the set of CP-rank-1 matrices, those that preserve the sets of CP-rank-1 matrices and the set of CP-rank-2 matrices, and those that strongly preserve the set of CP-rank-1 matrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it