MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1751377043 · doi:10.1002/cmmi.1461

DOTAM‐type ligands possessing arginine pendant groups for use in PARACEST MRI

2012· article· en· W1751377043 on OpenAlexafffund
Mojmı́r Suchý, Alex X. Li, Mark Milne, Robert Bartha, Robert H. E. Hudson

Bibliographic record

VenueContrast Media & Molecular Imaging · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersOntario Institute for Cancer Research
KeywordsArginineChemistryType (biology)BiochemistryBiologyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A synthetic methodology was developed for the preparation of metal-chelating ligands that possess arginine pendant groups relying on the alkylation of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane (cyclen) with arginine-containing electrophiles. Conditions for the selective trialkylation or peralkylation of cyclen are described, the outcome being dependent on the nature of the arginine-derived electrophile and the solvent used for the reaction. Lanthanide metal complexes of the ligands prepared by the described route were evaluated for their suitability as PARACEST contrast agents for use in magnetic resonance imaging. The Dy(3+) and Tm(3+) complexes display CEST effects that are associated with the amide protons proximate to the metal center. These signals exhibit pH dependence in the range of 6.0-8.0 and thus may have the potential for pH measurement in physiological range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContrast Media & Molecular ImagingSame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207