MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1751529791 · doi:10.1093/ojlr/rwv026

<i>Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General) </i>

2015· article· en· W1751529791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janet Epp Buckingham

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford Journal of Law and Religion · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharterLawStatutory lawConstitutionPolitical scienceFreedom of religionSociologyHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Constitutional law – Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Freedom of religion – Schools – Private Roman Catholic school requesting exemption from teaching secular Ethics and Religious Culture Course and proposing equivalent course from perspective of Catholic belief – Minister of Education refusing exemption on grounds proposal failing to meet statutory objectives of recognition of others, pursuit of common good, openness to human rights, and diversity – Court allowing school’s judicial review application of Minister’s refusal – Whether Minister’s decision proportionately balancing religious freedom with statutory objectives of mandatory program – Whether Minister’s insistence that proposed alternative program be entirely secular in approach reasonable given objectives of program – Whether decision infringing freedom of religion under Charter – Regulation respecting the application of the Act respecting private education, CQLR, c E-9.1, r 1, s 22; Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford Journal of Law and ReligionSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207