MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1752328622

Male-biased reproductive effort in a long-lived seabird.

2011· article· en· W1752328622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Kenyon (Kenyon College) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdBiologyEcologyPredation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In dimorphic seabirds, the larger sex tends to provision more than the smallersex. In contrast, monogamy and biparental care are often associated with equal effort betweenthe sexes. However, the few studies that have tested sex-specific effort in monomorphic seabirdshave primarily examined the details of foraging at sea. Hypotheses: Parental effort is also sex-biased in a monomorphic seabird mating system forone of two reasons: (1) If females enter the period of parental care less able to invest in care dueto the cost of egg production, male-biased effort may be necessary to avoid reproductive failure.(2) Alternatively, female-biased effort may occur due to the initial disparity in gamete size,particularly in species with internal fertilization. Organism: Leach’s storm-petrel ( Oceanodroma leucorhoa ), a monomorphic seabird with truemonogamy and obligate biparental care. Site: A breeding colony of Oceanodroma leucorhoa at the Bowdoin Scientific Station on KentIsland, Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick, Canada. Methods: Across multiple breeding seasons, we assessed incubation behaviour and chick-rearing behaviour through one manipulative and multiple observational studies. We assessedenergetic investment by inducing feather replacement and measuring the resulting rate of feather growth during both the incubation and chick-rearing phases of parental care. Conclusions: We observed male-biased effort. Males incubated the egg for a greater pro-portion of time than did females and, when faced with an egg that would not hatch, malescontinued to incubate past the point when females abandoned it. Males made a higher per-centage of total food deliveries to chicks than did females, resulting in greater mean dailyfood provisioning by males than by females. During chick rearing, males grew replacementfeathers more slowly than did females, indicating that males were more likely to reduce theirown nutritional condition while raising chicks than were females. These results support thehypothesis that females enter the period of parental care at a nutritional deficit and males mustcompensate to avoid reproductive failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it