MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1752499193

Variability of photosynthesis genes in purple bacteria and molecular determinants of their spectral properties

2004· dissertation· en· W1752499193 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christian Tuschak

Bibliographic record

VenueCarl von Ossiezky University of Oldenburg · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstJoint Genome InstituteDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsOperonBacteriaGenePurple bacteriaBiologyGeneticsBiochemistryPhotosynthesisBotanyEscherichia coliPhotosynthetic reaction centre
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural genes of the photosynthetic apparatus of two purple bacteria, Amoebobacter (Amb.) purpureus ML1 and Roseospirillum (Rss.) parvum 930I, were investigated by molecular biological methods. Analyses were focused on their light harvesting (LH) 1 core antenna, which is encoded within the puf operon. The puf-operon of the purple sulfur bacterium Amb. purpureus differs from the puf operon of the purple non-sulfur bacteria by exhibiting multiple copies of the LH1 genes pufBA and by variations in gene transcription and expression. Horizontal transfer of genes between Amb. purpureus and Allochromatium vinosum might have played a role during the evolution of the multiple pufA genes. Along with extraordinary absorption properties of the LH1-antenna (909 nm), Rss. parvum exhibits substitutions of amino acids within the LH1 alpha and beta polypeptides at positions that are highly conserved in other purple bacteria. 3D structural models of the polypeptides suggest that cysteine side chains in particular are involved in the modulation of the spectral properties of Rss. parvum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarl von Ossiezky University of OldenburgSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207