Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buddleia is a famous philosopher and sociologist of French today. He has systematically and deeply thought about the ontology of the sign, examining the contemporary society and its symptoms from the angle of Semiotics, putting forward the concept of consumption society, thinking that the people's consumption is more on the sign level but is not on the material layer. In the society, which has been reduced to all kind of signs, people consume various products, which are essentially signs so as to acquire their status recognition. The core thought of the postmodern theories concerning media of Buddleia is the theories of “ emulation ” and “ imitation”, thinking that we are in a new age of emulation, along with the technical emergence of micro-science and information technology, the ability of emulation has been on the increase, making emulation no longer the mimicry of the prototype only, but the emulation of the copy instead of the prototype ---this is imitation. In a world of token crisis which is dominated by sign code, those usually considered to be complete true will take up superrealistic imitation with reality lost completely in the fog of image and sign. Buddleia rewrites the relation between sign and reality and has exerted great influence on the Euro-American mass culture with his special theories to comb the topic of modern life and the composition and contact pattern. Key words: critique of semiotics, consumption society, postmodern media, emulation and imitation Resume: Baudelia est un illustre sociologue et phisolophe francais . Il a fait de profondes etudes sur l’ontologie des signes , et a traite de la societe moderne et ses problemes du point de vue semiotique . Il a avance le concept d’une societe de consommation . Selon lui , la consommation reside plus au niveau semiotique qu’au niveau materiel . Dan une societe de consommation , l’individu obtient sa propre identite par la consommation des objets . La pensee cles chez Baudelia est la theorie sur l’imitation et le mimetisme , selon laquelle nous sommes dans une nouvelle epoque d’imitation . Avec l’apparition de micro-science et de technique informatique , la capacite d’imitation que les etres humains possedent est de plus en plus forte , l’imitation ne signifie plus la simple copie du modele , mais devient de plus en plus le mimetisme qui est d’imiter les objets sans modele mais decides par la valeur structurale . Derriere les crises symptomatiques complete maitrisees par les signes , les objets generalement consideres tout a fait vrai sont munis des caracteristiques de surrealsme , la verite disparait dans la confuse des images et des signes . Baudelia redefinit la relation de signe/realite , et donne une grande influence sur la culture populaire aux etats-unis et dans les pays occidentaux Mots-cles: la critique des signes, la societe de consummation, les mass media post-contemporains, imitation et mimetisme 摘要： 鮑德里亞是當今法國著名的哲學家和社會學家。他對符號的本體論做過系統而深入的思考，以符號學的視角審視當代社會及其症候，提出了消費社會的概念，認為人們的消費活動更多的是在符號層面上而不是在物質層次上。在一個已經符號化的消費社會裏，人們通過消費各種作為符號的物品，而獲得各自的身份認同。鮑德里亞關於媒介的後現代理論的核心思想就是有關“仿真”和“擬象”的理論，認為我們目前所處的就是一個新型的仿真時代，隨著微觀科學和資訊技術的出現，人類的仿真能力日益強大，使仿真不再僅僅意味著對原型的模仿，仿真物發展為由結構價值決定的沒有原型的事物的摹本——擬像。在符碼主宰的徹底的表徵危機之下，那些通常被認為是完全真實的東西都將帶上超現時主義的擬像特徵，真實實在會完全消失在影像和符號的迷霧之中。鮑德里亞重寫了符號/現實的關係，以他特殊的理論視角梳理了當代生活世界的主題與客體的構成和交往形態，對當代歐美大眾文化研究產生了廣泛的影響。 關鍵詞： 符號批判；消費社會；後現代傳媒；仿真與擬像
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".