MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1754241681

Novel Definition of Cost Function for Camera Calibration using Vanishing Point Theorem

2012· article· en· W1754241681 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Razieh Zamani, Saeed Tousizadeh, Reihaneh Kardehi Moghaddam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of academic and applied studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCamera resectioningCamera auto-calibrationFocal lengthCalibrationDistortion (music)Computer visionVanishing pointFunction (biology)Camera lensArtificial intelligencePoint (geometry)Nonlinear programmingCamera matrixLens (geology)Computer scienceMathematicsProcess (computing)Simple (philosophy)AlgorithmPinhole camera modelNonlinear systemImage (mathematics)OpticsGeometryPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Camera calibration is the process of determining the internal camera parameters and optical characteristics (intrinsic parameters). It also determines the relation between the two dimensional (2D) image and the corresponding three dimensional (3D) real points. Intrinsic camera parameters include: Focal Length, Principal Point, and Lens Distortion. In this paper, for estimating the intrinsic camera parameters, a simple and novel cost function is proposed based on the spatial geometry principles. Minimizing the proposed cost function, results in an accurate and simultaneous estimation of intrinsic camera parameters. Nonlinear Programming is used as the optimization method and the result shows the effectiveness of our proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of academic and applied studiesSame topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207