Bibliographic record
Abstract
Energy plays an important role in the national security of any given country as a fuel to empower the economic sector. Access to cheap energy has become essential to the functioning of modern economies. Long term measures to increase energy security on reducing dependence on any one source of imported energy should be implemented. Therefore, biogas, biodiesel and solar cell are the alternative energy for Thai people since Thailand is agricultural country and locates in tropical zone. If Thai agricultural people bring theses energy to practice in their community, they will receive both individual benefit and environmental conservation. However, these are not accepted widely overall the country, therefore, it needs to educate them by adopting the environmental education process. The objective was to develop the energy security management for rural community through environmental education process. The mixed method research was employed to collect data. The qualitative research with focus group discussion and participatory action research through Participatory-Appreciation-Influence-Control (PAIC) were implemented. Particularly, PAIC can be accounted as an environmental education process. The sample group was selected by purposive sampling method. The 30 participants of community leaders were used as sample group based on the commitment to share knowledge, experiences and willingness to devote time for the whole process of training and to educate other peoples in the community after received the training. The finding revealed that after training, the mean scores of the participants in terms of knowledge, understanding, and attitude change were higher than before training with statistically significant respectively (p .05). They proposed two projects for implementation that were biogas development project and biodiesel development project for their community and the budgets were supported by community peoples and their Municipality. Key words: Development; Energy Security Management; Rural Community Resume L'energie joue un role important dans la securite nationale d'un pays donne comme le combustible pour l’habiliter le secteur economique. L'acces a l'energie bon marche est devenu essentiel au bon fonctionnement des economies modernes. Des mesures a long terme pour accroitre la securite energetique sur la reduction de la dependance a une source unique d'energie importee devrait etre mis en oeuvre. Par consequent, le biogaz, le biodiesel et de cellules solaires sont les energies de remplacement pour les Thailandais depuis que la Thailande est le pays agricole et localise dans la zone tropicale. Si les gens thailandaise agricoles apportent une energie theses de pratiquer dans leur communaute, ils recevront a la fois un benefice individuel et de conservation de l'environnement. Toutefois, ce ne sont pas largement acceptee globale du pays, par consequent, il a besoin de les eduquer en adoptant le processus d'education environnementale. L'objectif etait de developper la gestion de la securite energetique pour les collectivites rurales a travers le processus d'education environnementale. La methode de recherche mixte a ete employee pour collecter des donnees. La recherche qualitative avec des groupes de discussion et de recherche-action participative a travers participative-Appreciation-Influence-Control (PAIC) ont ete mises en oeuvre. En particulier, la PAIC peut etre represente comme un processus d'education environnementale. Le groupe echantillon a ete selectionne par la methode d'echantillonnage raisonne. Les 30 participants de leaders communautaires ont ete utilises comme groupe de l'echantillon repose sur l'engagement a partager les connaissances, les experiences et la volonte de consacrer du temps pour l'ensemble du processus de formation et d'eduquer les autres peuples dans la collectivite apres recu la formation. Le constat a revele qu’apres la formation, la moyenne des scores des participants en termes de changement des connaissances, la comprehension et l'attitude etaient plus eleves qu'avant la formation aux statistiquement significative (p 0,05). Ils ont propose deux projets de mise en oeuvre qui ont ete le developpement de projets de biogaz et de projet de developpement du biodiesel pour leur communaute et les budgets ont ete soutenus par les peuples communaute et de leur municipalite. Mots cles : Developpement; Gestion de la securite energetique; Communaute rurale
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".